Now IPV Sixaxis lists are similar to IP version for access lists.
Here are some examples.
Both can match the source IP address or destination IP address.
In the protocol header IP V-6 ACLU on IP V-6 IP addresses IP version for access lists on IP version
4 addresses both can match individual hosts addresses or subnets or prefixes in other which you can
match an individual host in a IPV sex and permit or deny that host or you could permit or deny a IP
version 6 Cybernet both IP version 4 and IP version 6 are applied in an inbound or outbound direction
on a layer 3 interface such as a router's interface or switch to virtual interface on a switch both
IP version 4 and IP version 6 can match on transport layer protocol information such as TCAP or UDP
source port number or destination port number both can also match ICMP message types and codes.
Be careful they aren't differences between the types and codes in IP version 6 versus IP version for
both have an implicit deny statement at the end that matches all remaining packets.
So a deny any any to the end of both IP version for an IP version 6.
Both also support time based access lists.
Now there are some differences between IP version for an IP version 6 IP version for access lists only
match IP version 4 packets and not IP version 6 and also only match fields in IP version 4 headers.
We have this concept of ships in the night IP version 6 is totally independent and separate to IP version
4.
So what IP version for is doing has nothing to do with IP version 6 and what IP version 6 is doing has
nothing to do with IP version 4 IP version 6 could be permitted.
But I provision for could be denied as an example IP version 6 access lists match on IP version 6 addresses
only said matches on source destination IP version 6 address as well as other fields unique to an IP
version 6 header.
Here are some examples of the differences between IP version for an IP version 6 IP version 4 access
lists.
Once again only match IP version 4 packets IP version 6 access lists only match IP version 6 packets
IP version for access lists identified by a name or a number.
But IP version 6 access lists only use names IP version for access lists identify whether an access
list is extended or standard by using either numbers such as 1099 being standard access lists or 100
to 199 being extended access lists or they use keywords such as standard or extended IP version 6 access
lists.
Use a similar convention of standard and extended access lists but they're only differentiated by the
use of a word rather than a number because numbers are not used in IP version 6 IP version for access
lists can match on specific values unique to provision for such as precedence type of service TTL and
fragments where as IP version 6 access lists a match on specific values unique to an IP version 6 header
such as a flow label or a DCP Valley as well as extensions an option head of values IP version 6 axis
lists have some implicit permit statements at the end of each access list.
Just above for the implicit deny all at the end of the access list which is IP version 4 access list
do not have implicit permit statements.