1
00:00:01,170 --> 00:00:02,220
So let's do a test.

2
00:00:02,220 --> 00:00:06,740
What happens if we move one of these ports into a different villain.

3
00:00:06,740 --> 00:00:10,430
Now earlier when I was doing this test I had some problems and genus 3.

4
00:00:10,950 --> 00:00:17,340
So what I'm gonna do is I'm a shut gigabit 0 2 down and give it at zero or three.

5
00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:27,900
So the only interfaces that are now up 0 0 and 0 1 in this topology just to start with a simple network

6
00:00:29,110 --> 00:00:30,430
to make a point.

7
00:00:30,520 --> 00:00:35,690
So those interfaces are up up the faces on down.

8
00:00:35,890 --> 00:00:44,180
What I do actually is just shut down any other interfaces to make sure that things converge quicker.

9
00:00:45,190 --> 00:01:01,520
So shut down that Drange and this range of interfaces show IP interface brief or so shut down gigabit

10
00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:03,800
3 0 2 3.

11
00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:12,240
So show IP interface brief interfaces are shut down except for those two interfaces.

12
00:01:12,290 --> 00:01:20,780
So gigabit 0 0 gigabyte 0 1 is Route 1 able to ping rodded to.

13
00:01:20,870 --> 00:01:22,190
Yes it is.

14
00:01:22,190 --> 00:01:33,610
But if we put to this interface gigabit 0 1 in TV land to what will happen with the pings.

15
00:01:33,620 --> 00:01:40,760
So switch port access violent to now before Precentor notice the pings succeeds.

16
00:01:40,760 --> 00:01:43,360
I'll repeat this a hundred times

17
00:01:48,620 --> 00:01:52,230
and then hit enter on the switchboard access.

18
00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:53,290
Vigeland c'mon.

19
00:01:53,600 --> 00:01:56,310
Notice the pings are starting to timeout.

20
00:01:57,100 --> 00:02:03,910
So as soon as I moved the port from one villain to another the devices are not able to communicate with

21
00:02:03,910 --> 00:02:05,170
each other.

22
00:02:06,190 --> 00:02:14,530
So spending tree shows that gigabit 0 1 is still in the learning phase of spanning tree so we'll wait

23
00:02:14,530 --> 00:02:18,320
for a while for spending three to converge and then do the test again.

24
00:02:18,610 --> 00:02:24,940
But what I'd like you to see is these two devices were in the same subnet and in the same villain and

25
00:02:24,940 --> 00:02:31,430
they were able to ping each other as soon as we moved one port to a different villain.

26
00:02:31,510 --> 00:02:39,490
They were no longer able to ping each other spending trees forwarding on violent to on port gigabit

27
00:02:39,490 --> 00:02:40,890
to 0 1.

28
00:02:40,990 --> 00:02:50,580
It's also forwarding on gigabit 0 00 on Villon one.

29
00:02:50,610 --> 00:02:58,770
So if we use the show spending summary command we can see that Villon one is forwarding the line to

30
00:02:58,990 --> 00:02:59,710
forwarding.

31
00:02:59,730 --> 00:03:01,200
There are no blocking ports

32
00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:14,800
yet Rato one is not able to ping router to and route it to is not able to ping Rotto one because they

33
00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:19,780
are in separate villans easy route to a way that it's in a separate villaine

34
00:03:22,860 --> 00:03:29,700
the answer is no because no tagging information or no veel and information is going to be sent on this

35
00:03:29,700 --> 00:03:30,430
port.

36
00:03:30,750 --> 00:03:32,450
It's an access port.

37
00:03:32,550 --> 00:03:37,340
So we just have stented Ethan It frames.

38
00:03:37,450 --> 00:03:47,580
There is no violent port information transmitted on any of the frames going out of that port.

39
00:03:47,620 --> 00:03:56,390
Now to prove this let's add some IP addresses on to switch one interface VLAN one IP address 10 1 1

40
00:03:56,680 --> 00:04:09,470
and let's make it 2 5 4 and then interface villaine to IP Address 10 1 2 2 5 4 with a mosque.

41
00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:12,050
Now I need to know shut both of those.

42
00:04:12,070 --> 00:04:17,300
So go back to the land one and no shut it.

43
00:04:17,480 --> 00:04:21,560
So these are layers 3 switched of virtual interfaces on the switch.

44
00:04:21,560 --> 00:04:28,460
We are basically creating a layer 3 IP address on the switch for the relevant VLAN So as an example

45
00:04:28,640 --> 00:04:36,080
the switch can ping Rato one on Villon one it lost the first ping because of all that.

46
00:04:36,330 --> 00:04:43,570
So which one can ping Rotto one it can ping rather too because Ratatouille needs to be configured with

47
00:04:43,570 --> 00:04:47,700
the right IP address for violent to that before I do that.

48
00:04:47,710 --> 00:04:50,800
Notice when I do a capture on that port

49
00:04:54,370 --> 00:05:04,490
traffic from the switch to the router is untagged it's a standard Ethernet frame IP traffic.

50
00:05:04,660 --> 00:05:07,110
There is no tagging at all.

51
00:05:07,930 --> 00:05:14,830
And as a last test what I'll do is configure router to say interface if seriously.

52
00:05:14,840 --> 00:05:20,170
Zero IP address tendered one to two.

53
00:05:20,260 --> 00:05:27,160
So I've moved it from one subnet to another paying two to.

54
00:05:27,220 --> 00:05:37,650
The switch can ping Rodda two on the port is the traffic tagged.

55
00:05:37,810 --> 00:05:42,290
So do the ping again full for ICMP traffic.

56
00:05:42,310 --> 00:05:45,380
Notice there is no tagging information at all.

57
00:05:45,460 --> 00:05:47,800
It's just stented Ethan it.

58
00:05:47,830 --> 00:05:50,820
So what is the summary of the test.

59
00:05:51,070 --> 00:05:57,340
The PCs in the typology are unaware of violent traffic.

60
00:05:57,430 --> 00:06:00,580
These are access ports or untagged ports.

61
00:06:02,230 --> 00:06:06,580
In other words to that one Q tagging is not used on these ports.

62
00:06:06,660 --> 00:06:12,400
Ken Rato one pink router too so it can pin 10 one to two at the moment.

63
00:06:12,400 --> 00:06:19,580
It won't be able to because the roads don't have default routes configured.

64
00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:29,500
So I'm going to turn off IP routing on these routers to turn them into PCs or dumb devices and type

65
00:06:29,500 --> 00:06:31,210
IP default gateway.

66
00:06:31,390 --> 00:06:40,750
And in this case the default gateway router to will be the IP address on Grado one new IP routing that's

67
00:06:40,760 --> 00:06:48,920
a c'mon that turns an expensive router into a dumb device IP default gateway tendered one to 1 or 2

68
00:06:48,940 --> 00:07:01,350
for 4 full Serrato one has a default gateway config it can ping its default gateway Yes it can Kennet

69
00:07:01,440 --> 00:07:06,410
paying Rodda to at the moment it can.

70
00:07:06,660 --> 00:07:10,850
And the reason why is that on these switches

71
00:07:13,670 --> 00:07:18,330
IP routing is configured by default.

72
00:07:18,330 --> 00:07:26,670
However if I typed no IP routing which is true on a lot of switches the pings will not succeed because

73
00:07:26,670 --> 00:07:33,480
the switch is not doing interval and routing to enable him to Villon riding on a three switch such as

74
00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:36,520
this or a physical switch.

75
00:07:36,570 --> 00:07:46,530
You need the IP routing command to route between the villains so to prove this on Route 2 I'll do a

76
00:07:46,740 --> 00:07:56,230
debug IP ICMP so we can see if I see that traffic is getting to the router do the ping again.

77
00:07:56,540 --> 00:07:59,190
And notice they are all the echo replies.

78
00:07:59,670 --> 00:08:03,210
We can do something similar on route a one

79
00:08:06,330 --> 00:08:13,840
and there are the echo replies debug IP packet will give us a low level information.

80
00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:22,210
I'll repeat this only once so I will send one ping which succeeded over the and what you can see is

81
00:08:22,210 --> 00:08:30,120
the packet was routed out of the router and sent to the destination as an IP packet.

82
00:08:30,130 --> 00:08:37,990
So in other words these end devices connected to a switch are no way that the switch is using villans

83
00:08:39,460 --> 00:08:41,800
the configuration of the switches as follows.

84
00:08:41,830 --> 00:08:44,840
Show run interface give it to 0 0.

85
00:08:44,950 --> 00:08:47,280
That port is using default configure which is.

86
00:08:47,380 --> 00:08:53,030
Which means that it's an access Port Vila and one gigabit zero or two is an access port in the land

87
00:08:53,030 --> 00:09:02,350
to IP routings enabled and we've configured the least 3 IP addresses on the TV villains to allow the

88
00:09:02,350 --> 00:09:08,920
switch to rot between the TV lens configured which in turn allows router 1 and to to communicate with

89
00:09:08,920 --> 00:09:10,260
each other.

90
00:09:10,270 --> 00:09:18,490
Now if router 1 and router 3 are put into the same land and router a 4 put into the same Villiam that

91
00:09:18,490 --> 00:09:25,120
kind of information needs to be communicated from one switch to another using Ada to the one key.

92
00:09:25,120 --> 00:09:27,860
So this port needs to be configured as a trunk port.

93
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:30,250
So let's prove that and then configure it.
