So rotted protocols include IP version for an IP version 6.
These protocols are independent of each other and to illustrate that let's look at a simple topology.
So he has a question for you.
Are these routers able to ping each other.
And the answer is yes and no there's a problem in the IP version 4 addressing structure in this topology.
If these two interfaces have IP addresses of 10.0 wanted 2.1 slushed 24 and 10 dot 1.40 slash 24 they
are in different subnets but have been configured on the same link so Rotto one and router two will
not be able to ping each other using IP version 4.
However IP version 6 has been correctly configured.
So these two addresses are in the same subnet and Rotto one and Rodek two will be able to ping each
other using IP version 6.
The point is what one rotted protocol does is totally independent and separate from a nother rafted
protocol raftered protocols such as IP version for an IP version 6 act and work independently of each
other and use a different routing protocols in the networking world.
This is often called ships in the night.
In other words what one ship in the night is doing is different to what another ship in the night is
doing.
Granted protocols are independent of each other and do not rely on one another raptor the protocols
use a different routing protocols as an example.
OSPF a vision too is a routing protocol used in IP version for OSPF version 3 is a writing protocol
used in IP version 6 different router protocols use different routing protocols and they act independently
of each other even if one ranted protocol is broken other rafted protocols may still function they are
two main ways that rats get added to the writing tables of rotas.
The first ways to use study Grotz where an administrator manually adds a raft to the writing table and
the second way is to use dynamic writing protocols.
So with static routes you as the administrator are adding the roots to the writing table.
The advantage of this method is that there is no overhead on the network.
In fact there are no keeper lives or constant writing updates saved between routers up or running information
protocol which is an older routing protocol sends its entire writing table every 30 seconds.
So when using static routes rather than wrap that overhead is removed more modern routing protocols
such as E.I. GOP and OSPF remove this constant updating that took place in Rupp every 30 seconds.
But they still send haloes and keep lowlives on the network which consume bandwidth with static routes
that is removed.
But the major disadvantage of steady gruts is that you as the administrator have to update the writing
table which could be a lot of work if you have a large network steady Grotz do not automatically take
into account changes in the network use.
The administrator would have to manually update the writing table on a router or multiple routers if
a link went down.
So the overhead is not on the network.
The overhead is on you as the administrator to keep everything updated.
Static Grotz do not scale when networks become large the amount of work involved in keeping routing
tables updated manually is just too great especially when there are lots of topology changes.
Static routes do not up date routing tables when it topology changes.
In most cases.
Now that being said it is possible these days to monitor IP addresses and for example to remove a rock
from the writing table.
If an IP address is no longer available so it's possible to implement some dynamic options with static
routes but the overhead is still large and static routes are cumbersome in large networks.
Now static Grotz are still used in a lot of networks today.
The most common example is a default static route.
Your home DSL or cable or fiber Rodda will typically have a default route to your service provider So
your home router doesn't know about the rats on the Internet.
It simply forwards the traffic to your ISP.
A default rot in a road is writing table basically tells the Rodda when you don't have a specific network
for traffic that you receive in your writing table.
Simply send the packets to the router that's configured as your default gateway or gateway of last resort.
So when you configure a default route on a router you are pointing it to another router which means
that that router will simply send the traffic to that default gateway when it doesn't have a more specific
route in the writing table.